Skip to content
Friday, May 09, 2025

LLMs in Scientific Research Workflows

  • Overview
    • LLMs & genAI
    • Potential Uses
    • FAQ
  • Resource Hub
    • Add a Resource
    • Search Resources
    • Research Articles
    • LLM Documentation
    • Tutorials on Using LLMs
    • Discussion Articles
    • Use Case Examples
  • For Researchers
    • Technical Toolkit
    • Design
    • Development
    • Prompting
    • Deployment
    • Documenting
    • Publication Checklists
  • For Reviewers
    • Introduction
    • Context
    • Prompts
    • Embeddings
    • Fine Tuning
    • Agents
    • Ethics
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Contact Us
site mode button

For Reviewers

In this sections are guides for how academic peer-reviewers (when presented with an article that uses LLMs in the workflow) can assess the appropriateness and thoroughness of the LLM methods applied.

  • Introduction For Reviewers
  • Context
  • Ethics
  • Embeddings
  • Prompts
  • Fine Tuning
  • LLM Agents

Recent Additions

  • Agency, Dimensions, and Dynamics in Human-AI Knowledge Co-Creation [in science]
  • How should LLMs affect the practice of science?
  • Scaling Laws of Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists
  • Before using GenAI for research on violence against women
  • Chatbots for Data Collection in Surveys

Share With Friends

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Email

Highlighted Resources

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • May 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023

Categories

  • New Article
  • New Documentation
  • New Guide
  • New Tutorial
  • Uncategorized
  • Website Update
Ryan Watkins and John Helveston 2023 | Theme: News Portal by Mystery Themes.